linux-kernel - Re: [SUGGESTION]: drop virtual merge accounting in I/O requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	mpatocka@...hat.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION]: drop virtual merge accounting in I/O requests

From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:50:55 +0200

> Still I would expect that modern IO controllers are typically fast
> enough at processing SG lists that it shouldn't matter much.

I know it matters a lot on sparc64 ESP scsi controllers.

You can only have one address/len pair DMA'ing at a time and you have
to service an interrupt to load in the the next DMA sg elements into
the chips registers.

Merging is essentially a must for performance on those cards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/