[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487A745A.3010902@goop.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:32:10 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "Jakub W. Jozwicki" <jozwicki@...er.pl>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...esys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.10 1/2] libata: fix locking for kmap_atomic
Jakub W. Jozwicki wrote:
> Sunday, 13 of July 2008 19:46:29 Jeremy Fitzhardinge napisaĆ(a):
>
>> Jakub W. Jozwicki wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, this was for -rt only.
>>>
>>> [ 17.012011] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
>>> IRQ-14(5732) at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:8
>>> [ 17.012011] in_atomic():0 [00000000], irqs_disabled():1
>>> [ 17.012011] Pid: 5732, comm: IRQ-14 Not tainted 2.6.25.10-rtXXX #11
>>> [ 17.012011] [<c0120fc4>] __might_sleep+0xf1/0xf8
>>> [ 17.012011] [<c011c035>] kmap+0x47/0x5a
>>>
>> The subject says kmap_atomic, but this is kmap. It definitely makes no
>> sense to call kmap in an IRQ, regardless of the locking. There seems to
>> be a larger structural problem here.
>>
>>
>
> --- linux-2.6.25.8-rt7.orig/include/asm-x86/highmem.h 2008-06-23
> 19:12:47.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25.8-rt7/include/asm-x86/highmem.h 2008-06-23
> 19:13:58.000000000 -0400
>
>
> +/*
> + * on PREEMPT_RT kmap_atomic() is a wrapper that uses kmap():
>
OK, I guess the "structural problem" is RT ;)
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists