[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080713091524.GA29907@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:15:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...ealbox.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
public-kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...gmane.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > Bingo. It's a HAL quirk.
> >
> > Testing from the console (not X):
> >
> > With 4b4f7280:
> > # echo mem >/sys/power/state -- works fine
> >
> > # echo 3 >/proc/sys/kernel/acpi_video_flags
> > # echo mem >/sys/power state -- fails to resume
> >
> > Without 4b4f7280:
> > # echo mem >/sys/power/state -- works fine
> >
> > # echo 3 >/proc/sys/kernel/acpi_video_flags
> > # echo mem >/sys/power state -- works fine
> >
> > So HAL contains an apparently unnecessary quirk for my laptop, and
> > 4b4f7280 breaks that quirk. Of course, it's entirely possible that
> > 4b4f7280 is 100% correct, but that the quirk only worked by accident and
> > 4b4f7280 broke the call into video BIOS.
>
> We've had reports from users of Intel graphics and the i915 driver
> that previously working quirks started to break their systems with
> 2.6.26-rc, but instead the plain "echo mem > /sys/power/state" started
> to work for them. Your system may be one of these, but I wonder what
> the effect of commit 4b4f7280 is.
>
> The first possibility is that the quirks actually didn't work on your
> system with 2.6.26-rc before commit 4b4f7280 at all for some obscure
> reason and that commit made them work again which in turn resulted in
> the breakage.
>
> The second possibility is that commit 4b4f7280 actually broke those
> quirks.
>
> I'm not sure if it's worth the effort to check which of the above
> really happened. After all, you can suspend and resume the box
> without any quirks now. ;-)
which is the ideal situation :-)
we still need to find the HAL quirk and disable it, right?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists