[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080713113734.GB7459@asus>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:37:34 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] lapic calibration results fix
Ingo, Maciej,
it seems I found a bit strange code snippet in apic_32.c:setup_boot_APIC_clock.
We set local_apic_timer_verify_ok = 1 before checking the results. I think
the following patch make sense. Please take a look on.
---
We set lapic flag that clocksource calibration is
fine too early. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c 2008-07-13 15:25:20.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c 2008-07-13 15:31:03.000000000 +0400
@@ -489,8 +489,6 @@ void __init setup_boot_APIC_clock(void)
calibration_result / (1000000 / HZ),
calibration_result % (1000000 / HZ));
- local_apic_timer_verify_ok = 1;
-
/*
* Do a sanity check on the APIC calibration result
*/
@@ -504,6 +502,8 @@ void __init setup_boot_APIC_clock(void)
return;
}
+ local_apic_timer_verify_ok = 1;
+
/* We trust the pm timer based calibration */
if (!pm_referenced) {
apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "... verify APIC timer\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists