[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <88E7CDF01964465CB9F33DE11298271D@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:12:51 +0900
From: "Takashi Sato" <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>
To: "jim owens" <jowens@...com>
Cc: <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
<xfs@....sgi.com>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<pavel@...e.cz>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hch@...radead.org>, "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
Hi,
jim owens wrote:
> In addition to the user controllable timeout mechanism,
> we internally implement AUTO-THAW in the filesystem
> whenever necessary to prevent a kernel hang/crash.
>
> If an AUTO-THAW occurs, we post to the log and an
> event manager so the user knows the snapshot is bad.
I am interested in AUTO-THAW.
What is the difference between the timeout and AUTO-THAW?
When the kernel detects a deadlock, does it occur to solve it?
Cheers, Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists