linux-kernel - Re: Multiple MSI, take 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:03:52 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	benh@...nel.crashing.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	matthew@....cx, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grundler@...isc-linux.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: Multiple MSI, take 3

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> The x86 system designers decided to implement multi-MSI in an
> inconvenient way, it is not a "crap hardware design", merely
> some (unfortunately common) implementations of it happen to be.

To be clear I was referring to the PCI spec that describes multi-MSI
as a crap hardware design.

At the very least you are left with the problem of allocating multiple
contiguous destinations.  Which has the potential to create
fragmentation on all supported platforms.

Optional mask bits are also nasty.

My honest opinion is that the should have deprecated multi-msi after the
introduction of the msi-x specification.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/