[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487B759B.40700@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:49:47 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>> Btw - the way to avoid this whole problem might be to make CPU migration
>> use a *different* CPU map than "online".
>
> In general I think we need more such masks. Some time ago I had
> a patch to introduce cpu_ever_online_mask, which prevented some
> problems with accessing uninitialized per cpu data.
Not to divert the conversation too much but I would like to see these
maps allocated based on the real number of cpus and not NR_CPUS.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists