[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807140856130.3305@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] core, x86: make LIST_POISON less deadly
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Why not use something sane like 0xdead000000000000, which has the high
> > bit set but very fundamentally isn't a valid pointer, and never will
> > be? And which is a *lot* more visually obvious too!
>
> initially i suggested that too - but such addresses raise a #GP instead
> of a page fault so their decoding is a bit harder.
But raising a GP is exactly what you want: a PF is an indication that the
address was actually half-way valid, and will not fault at all on some
(possibly future) machine.
> We dont do any instruction decoding in #GP handlers to figure out what
> happened, while in the pagefault case we know which address faulted,
> etc.
Why would we care? It would be very obvious from the instruction
disassembly plus the register contents. No need to decode instructions.
> Perhaps we could try to make #GP handlers a bit more informative -
> although decoding instructions will make things a bit more fragile
> inevitably.
>
> Perhaps make it 0xffffcdead0000000 ?
I'm really not seeing the reason for not just doing it right.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists