linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:25:22 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
CC:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@...g.uio.no>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	matt@...ehost.com, roberto@...it.it, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>, subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	eric.rannaud@...il.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure

> +/* The various types of throttling algorithms */
> +enum iothrottle_strategy {
> +	IOTHROTTLE_LEAKY_BUCKET,

It's better to explicitly assigned 0 to IOTHROTTLE_LEAKY_BUCKET.

> +	IOTHROTTLE_TOKEN_BUCKET,
> +};

> +static int iothrottle_parse_args(char *buf, size_t nbytes, dev_t *dev,
> +					u64 *iorate,
> +					enum iothrottle_strategy *strategy,
> +					s64 *bucket_size)
> +{
> +	char *p = buf;
> +	int count = 0;
> +	char *s[3];
> +	unsigned long strategy_val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* split the colon-delimited input string into its elements */
> +	memset(s, 0, sizeof(s));
> +	while (count < ARRAY_SIZE(s)) {
> +		p = memchr(p, ':', buf + nbytes - p);
> +		if (!p)
> +			break;
> +		*p++ = '\0';
> +		if (p >= buf + nbytes)
> +			break;
> +		s[count++] = p;
> +	}

use strsep()

> +
> +	/* i/o bandwidth limit */
> +	if (!s[0])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	ret = strict_strtoull(s[0], 10, iorate);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (!*iorate) {
> +		/*
> +		 * we're deleting a limiting rule, so just ignore the other
> +		 * parameters
> +		 */
> +		*strategy = 0;
> +		*bucket_size = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	*iorate = ALIGN(*iorate, 1024);
> +
> +	/* throttling strategy */
> +	if (!s[1])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	ret = strict_strtoul(s[1], 10, &strategy_val);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	*strategy = (enum iothrottle_strategy)strategy_val;
> +	switch (*strategy) {
> +	case IOTHROTTLE_LEAKY_BUCKET:
> +		/* leaky bucket ignores bucket size */
> +		*bucket_size = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	case IOTHROTTLE_TOKEN_BUCKET:
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* bucket size */
> +	if (!s[2])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	ret = strict_strtoll(s[2], 10, bucket_size);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (*bucket_size < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	*bucket_size = ALIGN(*bucket_size, 1024);
> +out:
> +
> +	/* block device number */
> +	*dev = devname2dev_t(buf);

why not parse dev before parse bandwidth limit ?

> +	return *dev ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int iothrottle_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
> +				const char *buffer)
> +{
> +	struct iothrottle *iot;
> +	struct iothrottle_node *n, *newn = NULL;
> +	dev_t dev;
> +	u64 iorate;
> +	enum iothrottle_strategy strategy;
> +	s64 bucket_size;
> +	char *buf;
> +	size_t nbytes = strlen(buffer);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	buf = kmalloc(nbytes + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!buf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	memcpy(buf, buffer, nbytes + 1);
> +

redundant kmalloc, just use buffer, and ...

> +	ret = iothrottle_parse_args(buf, nbytes, &dev, &iorate,
> +					&strategy, &bucket_size);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out1;
> +	if (iorate) {
> +		newn = kmalloc(sizeof(*newn), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!newn) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out1;
> +		}
> +		newn->dev = dev;
> +		newn->iorate = iorate;
> +		newn->strategy = strategy;
> +		newn->bucket_size = bucket_size;
> +		newn->timestamp = jiffies;
> +		atomic_long_set(&newn->stat, 0);
> +		atomic_long_set(&newn->token, 0);
> +	}
> +	if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp)) {
> +		kfree(newn);
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out1;
> +	}
> +	iot = cgroup_to_iothrottle(cgrp);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&iot->lock);
> +	if (!iorate) {
> +		/* Delete a block device limiting rule */
> +		n = iothrottle_delete_node(iot, dev);
> +		goto out2;
> +	}
> +	n = iothrottle_search_node(iot, dev);
> +	if (n) {
> +		/* Update a block device limiting rule */
> +		iothrottle_replace_node(iot, n, newn);
> +		goto out2;
> +	}
> +	/* Add a new block device limiting rule */
> +	iothrottle_insert_node(iot, newn);
> +out2:
> +	spin_unlock(&iot->lock);
> +	cgroup_unlock();
> +	if (n) {
> +		synchronize_rcu();
> +		kfree(n);
> +	}
> +out1:
> +	kfree(buf);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cftype files[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "bandwidth",
> +		.read_seq_string = iothrottle_read,
> +		.write_string = iothrottle_write,

and you should specify .max_write_len = XXX unless XXX <= 64.
You use 1024 in v4.

> +	},
> +};
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/