linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] x86 changes for v2.6.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807141359450.3305@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 changes for v2.6.27



On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> I'm a bit surprised that you'd say that for something that is a
> hardware-testing feature that needs a command-line option to be enabled at
> runtime.  I have always presumed that the default value is the recommended
> value, and I would think that that is what most people would assume.

No. The default value should be 'off', unless it's _needed_ by people.

Have you guys looked at the size of the kernel lately?

Bloat is bloat. Just because it's conditional is not an excuse.

Having an in-kernel memory tester is in no way better than having an 
out-of-kernel one that you pick at grub boot time, so the claim that it's 
a "recommended" thing is likely bogus too. 

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/