linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] x86 changes for v2.6.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807141422200.14679@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 changes for v2.6.27



On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Bloat is bloat. Just because it's conditional is not an excuse.

Btw, the reason I reacted was that that wasn't even the only one.

It was followed by that MTRR "cleanup" question, which also defaulted to 
'y', despite:

 - having a help message that warned about oopses and problems

 - answering 'y' then caused a follow-up of totally incomprehensible and 
   meaningless options with no help message what-so-ever.

Dammit, if _I_ find the option to be badly named, confusing, unnecessary 
and undocumented, maybe it should be a clue to somebody that it probably 
shouldn't exist, much less default to 'sure, do that crazy thing'.

(I think there was something else, but by then I didn't care any more, and 
just said no without even looking at the insane crap)

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/