[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487BD1DD.9040008@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:23:25 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: ia32_signal.c: use macro instead of immediate
Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
>>>
>>> Make and use macro FIX_EFLAGS, instead of immediate value 0x40DD5 in
>>> ia32_restore_sigcontext().
>>>
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>>> +# define FIX_EFLAGS (__FIX_EFLAGS | X86_EFLAGS_RF)
>>> +#else
>>> +# define FIX_EFLAGS __FIX_EFLAGS
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>> Where did this come from? First of all, this is in a 64-bit-only file,
>> so CONFIG_X86_32 will never be set; second of all, it seems a bit fishy
>> that these should be different.
>
> It came from arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c. (And signal_32.c has the same one.)
> And yes, CONFIG_X86_32 is not set, I compiled and compare the results,
> the macro was replaced by 0x40dd5, no RF.
> I guess, someone made it same on signal_32.c and signal_64.c.
>
Yes, it's working toward unification (and ia32signal.c is obviously also
a candidate for unification.) However, please make that a separate patch.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists