linux-kernel - Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1216082640.27455.116.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:44:00 -0700
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	david@...g.hm, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
	in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > I see no real point in that. If you have userspace to load modules, then
> > you have userspace to load firmware.
> 
> David, the case is different: the module is loaded _across_ the 
> suspend/resume, but the device needs to have its firmware reloaded at 
> resume time because it lost power.

Either I put my reply in response to the wrong quotation, or you thought
I did.

I intended the above to be a response to the "please put firmware _into_
the .ko file" request. Not to the suspend/resume thing.

Yes, I agree that suspend/resume is a non-issue.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/