[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87skubxxtq.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:10:09 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
gorcunov@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> So if the version were to be date-based, instead of releasing 2.6.26,
> maybe we could have 2008.7 instead. Or just increment the major version
> every decade, the middle version every year, and the minor version every
> time we make a release. Whatever.
Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists