[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0807150614j38204f41q3e7b4ed0ffff101b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:14:38 +0200
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework #2 of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"
2008/7/15 Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:50 AM, in message
> <b647ffbd0807140750r54e5139aj7b25a28ef7ca247e@...l.gmail.com>, "Dmitry
> Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2008/7/1 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>:
>>>
>>> Finally, this new version compiles and boots (applied a minor compilation
>> fix).
>>> Functionality is not yet fully tested though.
>>>
>>> It's on top of today's tip tree.
>>>
>>> Any objections to this approach?
>>
>> [ ping ]
>>
>> Gregory or anyone else, any feedback on this one?
>
> Hi Dmitry,
> A brief inspection of the patch looks good. I am still not convinced we need to worry
> about this condition anymore, however.
Neither am I.
It's just that (I think):
(a) either we remove this whole new 'concept' (as it's implemented
now) completely;
(b) or do it in a more generic way (like with this patch).
Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Regards,
> -Greg
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists