linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: traps and do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:21:43 -0700
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
	kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: traps and do_traps under one hood

On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 16:22 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Declaring x86 traps under one hood.
> Declaring x86 do_traps before defining them.

> arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c                |   20 ---------
> arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c                |   21 ----------
> include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_traps.h |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You put these back in mach-default/mach_traps.h but does that cover all
possibilities? What about other machine types?

Looking at the ifdefs you introduced in that header, it seems there's
more scope for unification here (although it makes sense for that to
come later).

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/