[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080715110726.5837c783.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:07:26 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maxk@...lcomm.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Make rebuild_sched_domains() usable from any
context
Max K wrote:
> Basically as Paul J. pointed out rebuild_sched_domains() is the
> only way to rebuild sched domains correctly based on the current
> cpuset settings. What this means is that we need to be able to
> call it from different contexts, like cpuhotplug for example.
The following is just a wild idea.
On systems using cpusets to setup scheduler domains (anything more
elaborate than the default of a single, system-wide, domain) have a
special purpose thread sit around, that does nothing except rebuild
sched domains on demand.
If this rebuild thread was the -only- way that sched domains were
allowed to be rebuilt, and if this rebuild was done -asynchronously-
sometime shortly after requested, without any error or status feedback,
then it would seem to simplify the locking issues.
I would guess that any system big enough to have a non-default, cpuset
determined, sched domain configuration is big enough to not mind one
more thread sitting around, doing nothing most of the time.
If the above is a really stupid idea, have fun taking out your
agression on it ;).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists