| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807150904290.3017@woody.linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: pageexec@...email.hu cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, pageexec@...email.hu wrote: > > by 'cover up' i meant that even when you know better, you quite > consciously do *not* report the security impact of said bugs Yes. Because the only place I consider appropriate is the kernel changelogs, and since those get published with the sources, there is no way I can convince myself that it's a good idea to say "Hey script kiddies, try this" unless it's already very public indeed. > see my comment about reality above. heck, even linux vendors do track > and announce them, it's part of the support they provide to paying > customers (and even non-paying users). Umm. And they mostly do a crap job at it, only focusing on a small percentage (the ones that were considered to be "big issues"), and because they do the reporting they also feel they have to have embargoes in place. That's why I don't do reporting - it almost inevitably leads to embargoes. So as far as I'm concerned, "disclosing" is the fixing of the bug. It's the "look at the source" approach. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists