[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807150931010.3017@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
cc: jeff@...zik.org, arjan@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,
use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Why don't you just take the kernel-supplied firmware and make it part of
> the kernel package? The same way the kernel-supplied modules are part of
> it?
And, btw, if there is something we can do to help, we obviously should.
So ask yourself (and DavidW) things like
- Is "make firmware_install" not enough for the package build system?
- Does it need some other way to figure out what firmware is needed for
just the configured set of drivers, eg "make firmware_list"?
- Do we need to make the firmware loader have multiple directories it
looks at? Do we want first a kernel-version-specific one, then a
generic fallback one, so that we can easily have per-kernel firmware,
the same way we have per-kernel modules?
- Add your interesting question here.
There are obviously all these kinds of _productive_ questions you can ask.
But people seem to be mostly in an unproductive "Mommy, it hurts when I do
something stupid" mode.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists