[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216143361.27455.294.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:36:01 -0700
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: david@...g.hm, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, jeff@...zik.org,
arjan@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 09:41 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think the _infrastructure_ is important. But the extreme "you
> have to split it off entirely" mindset is equally as stupid as the
> "you must compile it into the module" mindset.
I wouldn't necessarily argue that we _have_ to split it off, but I'd
certainly like our infrastructure to be mature enough that it could cope
with doing so.
I plan to make a 'linux-firmware-from-linus' git tree which is generated
automatically from yours by a script, much like the kernel-headers git
tree is, commit by commit with an automatic transform on the tree
objects.
Once we have that tree being created, we could pull from it into a
canonical 'linux-firmware' tree, and _that_ tree could also start to
include firmware belonging to companies who have said that we may
distribute their firmware, but _not_ as part of the Linux kernel.
We can see how that tree works out in practice, and how/whether people
start using it. And then maybe we'll be in a position to have a
_discussion_ about how best to ship the firmware. But for now it's
premature.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists