[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216143845.27455.304.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:44:05 -0700
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeff@...zik.org,
arjan@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 19:35 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> It's not only a problem of transfer, but also a problem of selection
> of what to copy overthere.
This is why the MODULE_FIRMWARE() tag exists.
Most scripts tend to get this right already -- they _have_ to, since
modern drivers have been using request_firmware() for some time already.
> Please don't compare an upgrade of a working desktop or developer
> machine with an installation from scratch of a server in an
> uncomfortable location. Those are two completely different things.
If your setup doesn't cope with MODULE_FIRMWARE(), it's likely to break
when you next deploy a new server anyway -- because your new server will
have new hardware, and your new hardware will have a modern driver. And
modern drivers use request_firmware() _anyway_.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists