[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807151211180.3351@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, pageexec@...email.hu wrote:
>
> in other words, try a better argument, possibly without bogeymen.
You know what - when nobody does embargoes, I'll consider your argument to
have a point.
In the meantime, I'm not in the least interested in your idiotic
arguments. Especially as you can't even read what I wrote:
> i don't see you embargo normal bug fixes, why would you embargo security
> bug fixes? they're just normal bugs, aren't they?
Exactly. I don't embargo them. I refuse to have anything to even _do_ with
organizations like vendor-sec that I think is a corrupt cluster-fuck of
people who just want to cover their own ass.
They're just normal bugs.
But that also doesn't mean that I see any reason to make it obvious what
to do to trigger them, and cause problems at universities and such. So I
don't do "here's how to exploit it" commit logs, for example.
(If you haven't been at a univerisity, you don't know how many smart young
people want to "try it to see". And if you have been there, and don't
think it's a problem when they do and wouldn't be happier if they didn't,
you probably don't know what the word "empathy" means).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists