[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807151317270.2867@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, pageexec@...email.hu wrote:
>
> in any case, i don't see why you can't put keywords into the commit
> that say the bug being fixed is 'security related' or 'potentially
> exploitable', etc. people can then decide how to prioritize them.
Because I see no point. Quite often, we don't even realize some random bug
could have been a security issue.
It's not worth my energy, in other words.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists