[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807151424020.16109@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,
use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 22:00 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> I really think we should use /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/. I do see the
>> point here that I don't wanna overwrite existing firmware from other
>> installed kernels. Especially if modules_install will install the
>> firmware files.
>>
>> So in case of non-Ubuntu distros we have to push a fix to udev, but that
>> is not a big deal. It should be a one-line change if I am not mistaken.
>
> My concern with that is that even though it's a one-line change, it's a
> one-line change which people don't already _have_. We really do need to
> remain compatible with existing setups.
when I read this I had to double check who the mail was from. this sounds
like exactly the statement that Jeff has been making in his arguments to
allow for the firmware-in-the-modules approach.
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists