linux-kernel - Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rene.herman@...access.nl
Cc:	david@...g.hm, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
 in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:23:14 +0200

> On 15-07-08 03:52, David Miller wrote:
> 
> > From: david@...g.hm Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
> > 
> >> I agree with this, but the proponents of the seperate firmware are
> >> listing the fact that the firmware doesn't tie up ram as one of the
> >> big reasons for making the change.
> > 
> > Exactly.
> > 
> > Otherwise these firmware changes are utterly pointless.
> 
> The point of them is legal.

Thanks for proving something I tried to establish for weeks
but which Alan Cox, David W., and others vehemently denied.

They states that it was being done on a technical basis rather
than being predominantly a legal one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/