[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216159959.26991.48.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:12:39 -0700
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, david@...g.hm,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:39 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> 'make modules_install && make install' will
> * install modules in /lib
> * install firmware in /lib [2.6.27 only]
> * install kernel
> * update grub
> * rebuild initrd
>
> Do this, under both 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> 2.6.26 will put a working driver into initrd.
>
> 2.6.27 will put a dead driver into initrd (because no firmware got
> copied into initrd image).
I believe your claim is untrue. It uses the distribution's tool to
create the initrd, doesn't it? And those tools _do_ handle the
MODULE_FIRMWARE() tags and pull in appropriate firmware. They've had to
get that right for _years_ already.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists