linux-kernel - Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080714.194032.117461306.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, arjan@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
 in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:33:25 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > 
> > My complaints are about --not breaking stuff--, not request_firmware().
> 
> Guys, request_firmware() has been around for about five years now.

Jeff's not against request_firmware() in an of itself.

He's against the fact that it's not possible to build a
self-contained foo.ko module file any longer, and that
would definitely be possible with using request_firmware().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/