[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216090112.27455.173.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:48:32 -0700
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from
in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 22:22 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> You have to look at the build process, second stage image builders,
> embedded system image creators, and other "hangers on" that do not look
> and behave like a mainstream Linux distro.
>
> It is a mistake to assume that all systems are _already_ prepared to
> install and digest new /lib/firmware files that the kernel build now
> spits out.
I didn't just assume it. I checked the major distributions -- and they
_do_ check the MODULE_FIRMWARE() tags in the modules they include, and
include the corresponding firmware. The firmware loader has been around
for a _long_ time now, and they've had to support this for almost as
long.
Yes, there are occasional bugs -- and I'm sure there _are_ some minor
distributions or 'image creators' out there which still don't cope.
But that isn't a new problem -- and it's certainly not _caused_ by us
updating a small handful of the older drivers to match what modern
drivers do.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists