[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487D89E3.9070604@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:40:51 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: akataria@...are.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
TJ <linux@...orld.net>
Subject: Re: acpi based pci gap calculation - v3
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:54 pm Alok Kataria wrote:
>> I have tested it with couple of different BIOS settings and it seems to
>> work as it should.
>>
>>> Most of the PCI bugs we
>>> have at the moment are related to PCI resource allocation failures. My
>>> hope is that finding more space will fix most of them. Assuming this
>>> patch doesn't have any dependencies, I can put it in my linux-next
>>> branch.
>> No dependencies, I had added a function e820_search_gap which is used by
>> this patch. This function is already in the mainline tree.
>> Thanks for applying.
>
> Ok, I stuffed it in my linux-next branch. I'll let it sit there for a day or
> so though, just to shake out any build problems etc. in linux-next before
> asking Linus to pull the whole lot.
For me it seems a little risky to push up that early. I think it would
be better to let it sit longer in linux-next for this. After all this is
a major change how IO resources are allocated. That is why I didn't pull
it into the ACPI release branch.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists