[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17ibmbd39.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:41:14 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for device classes.
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> writes:
> Greg, please disregard my earlier NACKs and commit the patches if you're
> okay with them. I'm working on cleaning it up but I don't think I'll be
> able to make it in time for merge window and as Eric said getting the
> functionality in place is more important at this point as it doesn't
> affect user visible interface.
>
> Eric, with the multiple superblocks, sysfs now uses inode from the
> default sysfs_sb with dentries from other sb's. Is this okay? Are
> there any other filesystems which do this?
I don't know of any other filesystems where this unique challenge arises.
/proc almost qualifies but it never needs to be modified.
It is certainly ok to go from multiple dentries to a single inode.
I'm trying to remember why I choose to do that. I think both because it simplifies
the locking and keeps us more efficient in the icache.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists