[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487D93CD.1000007@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:23:09 -0700
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stopmachine: add stopmachine_timeout v2
Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Thank you for useful feedbacks!
> Here is the updated version.
> Could you put this on top of your patches, Rusty?
>
> Thanks,
> H.Seto
>
>
> If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up
> by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because the
> locked cpu cannot stop. This means all other healthy cpus
> will be blocked infinitely by one dead cpu.
>
> This patch allows stop_machine to return -EBUSY with some printk
> messages if any of stop_machine's threads cannot start running on
> its target cpu.
>
> v2:
> - remove fix for warning since it will be fixed upcoming typesafe
> patches
> - make stopmachine_timeout from secs to msecs, and set default to
> 200 msec (since v1's arbitrary 5 sec is too long)
> - allow disabling timeout by setting the stopmachine_timeout to 0
>
I'd set the default to zero. I beleive that's what Heiko suggested too.
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists