lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:57:25 +0200 From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, gorcunov@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu Subject: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? On 16-07-08 09:53, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Tuesday 2008-07-15 22:43, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> The 2.6. prefix is like with X which is version 11 for 20 years and >> still counting. >> >> Or like with X11R6, that became X11R7 after 11 years, there might be >> in a few years some big change that will warrant a 2.8 or 3.0 (the >> rewrite of the kernel in Visual Basic .NET ;-) ). > > Jumping the major number would really require some big flag day. > What was it that made the jump from 1.x to 2.0? > (Some ABI change w.r.t. binaries -- ELF becoming standard maybe?) SMP support. Rene -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists