[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487DACBB.6000909@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:09:31 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
CC: David Hubbard <david.c.hubbard@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@....nl>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] (almost) booting allyesconfig -- please don't poke super-io
without request_region
On 16-07-08 09:46, Jean Delvare wrote:
> As a conclusion, there is no clear relationship between the presence
> of an ISA or LPC bridge and the presence of a Super-I/O chip. All we
> can say is that apparently all PC systems have an ISA bridge. So
> indeed we can probably make the probes conditional upon the presence
> of an "ISA bridge" PCI device. That's very easy to test. In practice
> it might be equivalent to making the driver x86-only.
And foregoing non (pre-) PCI. Admittedly, that might not be much of an
issue and I don't know if "Super-I/O" is maybe even defined such as to
make it a NON issue but I do for example remember my old 386 chipset
providing for extended serial rates which I thought was way cool back
then. If that's Super-I/O (or something that should/could be covered by
the infrastructure at least) then PCI wouldn't be helpful.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists