[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216199347.5232.37.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:09:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, arjan@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied
from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 23:07 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > Whilst it would be great for unified development on the tools that
> > create the early boot process, I think it's a non-starter due to the
> > fact that you can't really do it without throwing out everything you
> > already have today. The same reason imo, that hpa's klibc work hasn't
> > gained mass-appeal from vendors.
>
> Quite true and IMO disappointing, because klibc would make great
> infrastructure for rolling out things just like this.
Indeed, for one i've been told it would enable cross compiling of
initrds, without which I deem initrd useless junk - whoever still
compiles their kernel on the machine it will run on? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists