linux-kernel - Re: acpi based pci gap calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <487E22EA.8030005@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:33:46 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC:	akataria@...are.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	TJ <linux@...orld.net>
Subject: Re: acpi based pci gap calculation  - v3


> The only problem there is that linux-next doesn't get nearly the sort of 
> testing coverage we need for this kind of change.

Normally I tend to wait for one -mm release, which seems to be tested
by a reasonable number of people. If it survives that it is good
to be tested in Linus' tree.

Just stuffing this in in literally the last minute doesn't seem
like a good idea.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/