[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807162100380.4316@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:03:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"andreas.herrmann3" <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Richard <tuxbox.guru@...il.com>, eumaster@...il.com,
uli.geins@...ns-web.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: AMD Mobile Semprons (3500+, 3600+,...) break with
nohz and highres enabled
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> This is against Andi's (ak) release branch,
> hope that is ok...
No idea what that is.
> Can this one be reviewed/added, pls.
Reviewed yes. Added no.
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index b854a89..bda0164 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,32 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart tick_sched_timer(struct
> hrtimer *timer)
> return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> +static __init int is_nohz_broken(void)
> +{
We definitely do not add x86 quirks into the generic code.
Is there really no other way to fix this problem ? Which chipset is
involved here ? SB400/600 perhaps ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists