[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807161651.44990.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:51:44 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates
On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:45 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Yeah, they're interdependent (I pulled from Len's tree, hopefully Andi
> > preserved the changesets).
>
> Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM.
Ugg, when Andi took over we talked about it; I thought we had agreed that he
would stick with Len's tree. I guess I was wrong.
> I was going to complain about it, because Len's trees were always a
> pleasure to pull with clearly delineated topic branches etc, and pulling
> from Andi was such a let-down in comparison.
Is a topic branch flow like what Len uses documented somewhere that you know
of? I know my process could use some improvement; I'd rather not have to
wait for Len to come back to ask him. :)
Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists