lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807161651.44990.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:51:44 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates

On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:45 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Yeah, they're interdependent (I pulled from Len's tree, hopefully Andi
> > preserved the changesets).
>
> Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM.

Ugg, when Andi took over we talked about it; I thought we had agreed that he 
would stick with Len's tree.  I guess I was wrong.

> I was going to complain about it, because Len's trees were always a
> pleasure to pull with clearly delineated topic branches etc, and pulling
> from Andi was such a let-down in comparison.

Is a topic branch flow like what Len uses documented somewhere that you know 
of?  I know my process could use some improvement; I'd rather not have to 
wait for Len to come back to ask him. :)

Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ