[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080716044905.GA9033@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:49:05 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, greg@...ah.com,
'Justin Forbes' <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
'Zwane Mwaikambo' <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@....edu>,
'Randy Dunlap' <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
'Dave Jones' <davej@...hat.com>,
'Chuck Wolber' <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
'Chris Wedgwood' <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
'Michael Krufky' <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
'Chuck Ebbert' <cebbert@...hat.com>,
'Domenico Andreoli' <cavokz@...il.com>,
'Willy Tarreau' <w@....eu>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
'Alan Cox' <alan@...hat.com>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
casey@...aufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 (resume)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:01:24AM -0300, Rodrigo Rubira Branco wrote:
> First of all sorry for copy many people who maybe are not in the initial
> discussion, but since I've not been copied I have no idea who are and who
> are not in that thread ;)
>
> The point that many people are trying to make is that Linux has a policy
> defined in a document (Documentation/SecurityBugs) but are not following it.
{sigh}
Are you sure? What specific sentance(s) are you saying that we are not
currently following. And if not, can you propose a patch to the file to
properly reflect how you seem to think we currently are working?
getting very annoyed at people saying I am somehow doing the job I do
for free, on my own time, incorrectly,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists