[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080717071435.911A415411D@magilla.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] fix dangling zombie when new parent ignores children
This fixes an arcane bug that we think was a regression introduced
by commit b2b2cbc4b2a2f389442549399a993a8306420baf. When a parent
ignores SIGCHLD (or uses SA_NOCLDWAIT), its children would self-reap
but they don't if it's using ptrace on them. When the parent thread
later exits and ceases to ptrace a child but leaves other live
threads in the parent's thread group, any zombie children are left
dangling. The fix makes them self-reap then, as they would have
done earlier if ptrace had not been in use.
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index a2af6ca..93d2711 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -703,6 +703,23 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk)
}
/*
+ * Return nonzero if @parent's children should reap themselves.
+ *
+ * Called with write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock) held.
+ */
+static int ignoring_children(struct task_struct *parent)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct sighand_struct *psig = parent->sighand;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&psig->siglock, flags);
+ ret = (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN ||
+ (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&psig->siglock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
* Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
* Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list.
*
@@ -711,6 +728,7 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk)
static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead)
{
struct task_struct *p, *n;
+ int ign = -1;
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &parent->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
__ptrace_unlink(p);
@@ -726,10 +744,18 @@ static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead)
* release_task() here because we already hold tasklist_lock.
*
* If it's our own child, there is no notification to do.
+ * But if our normal children self-reap, then this child
+ * was prevented by ptrace and we must reap it now.
*/
if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, parent))
do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal);
+ else {
+ if (ign < 0)
+ ign = ignoring_children(parent);
+ if (ign)
+ p->exit_signal = -1;
+ }
}
if (task_detached(p)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists