[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080717182835.55405e63.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:28:35 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:10 +1000 Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com> wrote:
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there,
> >> but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?)
> >>
> >> Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to
> >> Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git
> >> tree needs to be regenerated.
> >
> > Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree
> > now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look
> > fixed up.
>
> Yep, I believe Lachlan is planning to regenerate the xfs git tree before
> the pull request.
When that happens, could you please make sure that the linux-next tree is
updated as well ... I have had a couple of trees where what was merged to
Linus did not match what is in linux-next - and that causes me no end of
pain when I have to merge the two ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists