lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216286250.5232.67.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:17:30 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Alex Nixon (Intern)" <Alex.Nixon@...citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Large increase in context switch rate

On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:54 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> We have Alex Nixon doing some profiling of Xen kernels, comparing 
> current pvops Xen and native with the last "official" Xen kernel 
> 2.6.18.8-xen.
> 
> One obvious difference is that the kernbench context switch rate is way 
> up, from about 30k to 110k.  Also, the user time went up from about 375s 
> to 390s - and that's comparing pvops native to 2.6.18.8-xen (pvops Xen 
> was more or less identical).
> 
> I wonder if the user time increase is related to the context switch 
> rate, because the actual context switch time itself is accounted to the 
> process, or because of secondary things like cache and tlb misses.  Or 
> perhaps the new scheduler accounts for things differently?
> 
> Anyway, I'm wondering:
> 
>     * is the increased context switch rate expected?
>     * what tunables are there so we can try and make them have
>       comparable context switch rates?
> 
> This is an issue because the Xen/pvops kernel is showing a fairly large 
> overall performance regression, and the context switches a specifically 
> slow compared to the old Xen kernel, and the high switch rate is 
> presumably compounding the problem.  It would be nice to have some knobs 
> to turn to see what the underlying performance characteristics are.

Is this specific to Xen?, as a native kernel doesn't do more than ~3k
cs/s with make -j3 on my dual core.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ