linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/23] tracehook: add linux/tracehook.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080717133426.GA9577@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:34:26 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] tracehook: add linux/tracehook.h

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:48:18PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > The new linux/ptrace.h inlines are used by the following patches in the
> > new tracehook_*() inlines.  Using these helpers for the ptrace event
> > stops makes it simple to change or disable the old ptrace implementation
> > of these stops conditionally later.
> 
> Call them "utrace_*" from the start?

Yes, please.

> Pointless 1:1 wrapper unless you're going to #ifdef ->ptrace later.

Even then I don't think it's a good idea.  This one should only be
touched in very very few places

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/