[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080717152006.GA26120@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:20:06 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:04:22AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:13:35PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:05:19PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > I think it would be better to have a module that scans the device tree
> > > > for LED nodes and registers a single leds-gpio platform device for the
> > > > whole lot.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > I like the idea, thanks.
> >
> > Ugh, no. The idea sounds good, but in practice it isn't, since we'll
> > have to handle suspend/resume ops ourselves. When we stick with the
> > device/driver model we're getting all this for free.
>
> Won't the leds-gpio driver give you suspend/resume support?
Ah. I just wrongly read your message. You're purposing to use gpio
leds platform driver... I think this is doable, yes.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists