[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080717144342.GA15844@unused.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:43:42 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 on latest -git: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at 0000000c
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Ok run dumpe2fs -h on your image and see if you have a line that says
> >
> > Errors behavior: Continue
> >
> > if you do run tune2fs -e remount-ro and then do the mount. That would explain
> > why you are still having panics even though we should be aborting the journal.
> > Thanks,
>
> Ahh, that probably explains it. I didn't realize there was such a thing.
>
> I am doing random-corruption tests, so it is quite possible that this
> bit gets set anywhere along the road...
>
> But even so, is it correct that the kernel should crash? It seems
> quite possible that error behaviour can change (like this) even with
> "normal" corruption, e.g. outside my test scripts.
>
Yeah thats a hard to answer question, one that I will leave up to others who
have been doing this much longer than I. My thought is remount-ro is there to
keep you from crashing, so if you have errors=continue then you expect to live
with the consequences. Course if that bit gets flipped via corruption thats not
good either. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists