linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:30:36 -0400
From:	fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs 	(part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address)

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> writes:

> [...]
> Just by way of illustration, this is systemtap fixed up according to
> suggestion number 1.  You can see now using your test case that we get:
>
> # probes
> kernel.function("do_open@...block_dev.c:929") /* pc=<lookup_bdev+0x90> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> kernel.function("do_open@...nfsctl.c:24") /* pc=<sys_nfsservctl+0x6a> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> kernel.function("do_open@.../mqueue.c:642") /* pc=<sys_mq_unlink+0x130> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> [...]

Can you explain in detail how you believe this is materially
different from offsetting from _stext?

- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/