[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18559.37282.156032.998661@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:38:26 +0200
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: Loic Grenie <loic.grenie@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Typecast problems in SKFP driver
Loic Grenie writes:
> I've just compiled the 2.6.26-git5 kernel and the SKFP driver
> compilation produces complaints about typecasts. These complaints
> disappear with the following patch.
NAK, this needs to be done by someone with better understanding of C.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Loïc Grenié
> diff --git a/drivers/net/skfp/ess.c b/drivers/net/skfp/ess.c
> index 889f987..d3a8afc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/skfp/ess.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/skfp/ess.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void ess_send_response(struct s_smc *smc, struct smt_header *sm,
> chg->path.para.p_type = SMT_P320B ;
> chg->path.para.p_len = sizeof(struct smt_p_320b) - PARA_LEN ;
> chg->path.mib_index = SBAPATHINDEX ;
> - chg->path.path_pad = (u_short)NULL ;
> + chg->path.path_pad = (u_short)(long)NULL ;
> chg->path.path_index = PRIMARY_RING ;
Putting NULL (a pointer type) in an u_short field is utterly
and completely broken. My guess is that the code really wants:
chg->path.path_pad = 0;
> /* set P320F */
> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void ess_send_alc_req(struct s_smc *smc)
> req->path.para.p_type = SMT_P320B ;
> req->path.para.p_len = sizeof(struct smt_p_320b) - PARA_LEN ;
> req->path.mib_index = SBAPATHINDEX ;
> - req->path.path_pad = (u_short)NULL ;
> + req->path.path_pad = (u_short)(long)NULL ;
> req->path.path_index = PRIMARY_RING ;
ditto
>
> /* set P0017 */
> @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static void ess_send_alc_req(struct s_smc *smc)
> /* set P19 */
> req->a_addr.para.p_type = SMT_P0019 ;
> req->a_addr.para.p_len = sizeof(struct smt_p_0019) - PARA_LEN ;
> - req->a_addr.sba_pad = (u_short)NULL ;
> + req->a_addr.sba_pad = (u_short)(long)NULL ;
> req->a_addr.alloc_addr = null_addr ;
ditto
>
> /* set P1A */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/skfp/pmf.c b/drivers/net/skfp/pmf.c
> index ea85de9..5798be4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/skfp/pmf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/skfp/pmf.c
> @@ -44,17 +44,17 @@ static SMbuf *smt_build_pmf_response(struct s_smc *smc, struct smt_header *req,
> int set, int local);
> static int port_to_mib(struct s_smc *smc, int p);
>
> -#define MOFFSS(e) ((int)&(((struct fddi_mib *)0)->e))
> -#define MOFFSA(e) ((int) (((struct fddi_mib *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFSS(e) ((long)&(((struct fddi_mib *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFSA(e) ((long) (((struct fddi_mib *)0)->e))
NAK, use offsetof().
How is the MOFFSA() used? As written it makes no sense at all
as evaluating it as an r-value will oops.
>
> -#define MOFFMS(e) ((int)&(((struct fddi_mib_m *)0)->e))
> -#define MOFFMA(e) ((int) (((struct fddi_mib_m *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFMS(e) ((long)&(((struct fddi_mib_m *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFMA(e) ((long) (((struct fddi_mib_m *)0)->e))
ditto
>
> -#define MOFFAS(e) ((int)&(((struct fddi_mib_a *)0)->e))
> -#define MOFFAA(e) ((int) (((struct fddi_mib_a *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFAS(e) ((long)&(((struct fddi_mib_a *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFAA(e) ((long) (((struct fddi_mib_a *)0)->e))
ditto
>
> -#define MOFFPS(e) ((int)&(((struct fddi_mib_p *)0)->e))
> -#define MOFFPA(e) ((int) (((struct fddi_mib_p *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFPS(e) ((long)&(((struct fddi_mib_p *)0)->e))
> +#define MOFFPA(e) ((long) (((struct fddi_mib_p *)0)->e))
ditto
To be fair, the original code is crap, but your changes don't
make it any better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists