linux-kernel - Re: Please pull ACPI updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807171212500.2959@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> No, what others do (if they know the tricks) is to say something like:
> 
> 	git rebase -i <starting-point>

Oh, and before anybody goes any further with this: it's a very convenient 
feature, but it _is_ still technically nothing but a very nice interface 
to cherry-picking and rebasing history. 

So all the caveats about _not_ doing this with public history that others 
have already seen and possibly merged are still in place. That part 
doesn't change at all.

So it's great to do with private changes to clean them up before 
publicizing them, or possibly with branches that you have explicitly told 
people are _not_ stable, but it is still very much about creating a 
totally new history.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/