[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <487F6972.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:46:58 -0600
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: "Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
<dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<pj@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched:
Introduce cpu_active_map and redoscheddomainmanagment (take 2)
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:52 PM, in message <487F9509.9050802@...lcomm.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com> wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>
>> Hi Max,
>> Thanks for the pointers. I see that I did indeed misunderstand the intent
>> of the patch. It seems you already solved the rebuild problem, and were
>> just trying to solve the "migrate to a dead cpu" problem that Linus mentions
>> as a solution with cpu_active_map.
>
> Yes. btw they are definitely related, because the reason we were blowing
> away the domains is to avoid "migration to a dead cpu". ie We were relying
> on the fact that domain masks never contain cpus that are either dying or
> already dead.
Agreed.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> None at this point :). I need to run right now and will try to look at this
> later today. My knowledge of the internal sched structs is definitely
> lacking so I need to look at the rq->rd thing to have and opinion.
Sounds good, Max. Thanks!
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists