linux-kernel - Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:40:41 -0400
From:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To:	Alastair Stevens <alastair@...rux.me.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:05:07PM +0100, Alastair Stevens wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Forgive me if I missed it, but I've not seen any suggestions along the lines
> of this: how about just dropping the now-meaningless '.6' from the version
> string and retaining the rest. In other words:
> 
>    2.27
>    2.27.1
>    ...
>    2.28
>    2.28.1
>    2.28.2
> 
> That way you continue the series in a meaningful way, whilst reverting to a
> neater 3-level numbering scheme again. Perhaps you could make 2.[6.]30 the
> switchover point....

So what makes the 6 meaningless and the 2 meaningful and worth keeping?

It does nothing for Linus's dislike of large numbers either.

-- 
Len Sorensen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/