[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807162108.14349.vlobanov@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:08:14 -0700
From: Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>
To: Soumyadip Das Mahapatra <soumya.linux@...oo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] : A better approach to compute int_sqrt in lib/int_sqrt.c
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 02:35:56 pm Soumyadip Das Mahapatra wrote:
> > > */
> > > unsigned long int_sqrt(unsigned long x)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned long op, res, one;
> > > -
> > > - op = x;
> > > - res = 0;
> > > -
> > > - one = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 2);
> > > - while (one > op)
> > > - one >>= 2;
> > > -
> > > - while (one != 0) {
> > > - if (op >= res + one) {
> > > - op = op - (res + one);
> > > - res = res + 2 * one;
> > > - }
> > > - res /= 2;
> > > - one /= 4;
> > > - }
> > > - return res;
> > > + unsigned long ub, lb, m;
> > > + lb = 1; /* lower bound */
> > > + ub = (x >> 5) + 8; /* upper bound */
> > > + do {
> > > + m = (ub + lb) >> 1; /* middle value */
> > > + if((m * m) > x)
> > > + ub = m - 1;
> > > + else
> > > + lb = m + 1;
> > > + } while(ub >= lb);
> > > +
> > > + return lb - 1;
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(int_sqrt);
>
> 0 It is better because
> o contains no division operator (older version has two)
> which are surely comparatively slow task in computer
Actually, the old version has zero division operators; those are simply
right-shifts.
-- Vadim Lobanov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists